VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN WORLDWILD

How defines the violence against the woman? It is an action that exerts certain men on the women who cannot be defended, can be an action of violent physics, sexual verbal or.
Now that already we know how it is defined that it is the violence against the woman. It is necessary to stand out as it is the relation that has this with the violence against the young innocents, to begin is necessary to ask to us
 How defines the violence against the children? It is any verbal physical action or sexual against a boy who cannot be defended, the infantile violence is generally of an adult against a boy but despite, it does not mean that a adolecente cannot do it.
Or with both defined terms we can emphasize that the relation that it has is “woman or young who cannot BE DEFENDED” reason why a being with greater strength imposes with its force when it could not with the talent when the rage I win to him, which means that the people who comment these reprochables acts they are victims of a car considers low. What it takes to think to me is logical, because if is able to attempt against that it is not possible to be defended are able to attempt against of themselves, this is something that worries much because everything comes from the raising.
Some points that we can emphasize
 Pro
 1. Honestly something that I can stand out is that if a woman is struck by a man it is or is not effeminate that man lets much think like for example, if the man I strike to its pair because its pair did not do what it wanted leaves thinking me about… That that man could not win in arguments against that woman who sees itself very followed
 2. When making actions against the integrity of a boy there is one of two possibilities if this young taking everything what it happens to him in its benefit, any single traumatic event will return stronger it in himself, but that boy is a weak boy who only feeds the pain will become like those who did that damage to him whatever it was.
Against
 1. As it says the phrase “To a woman does not stick nor with the petal of a rose” this class to him of actions single serve to feed the machismo, of a form that propagates like plague since in them mass media are becoming something frequents listening as a family destroys because a man I strike its wife, which only leaves thinking us  If one is going away to regret later so that it does? Because it sees day it day and it feeds
 2. When you are a boy you are influenciable what us it leaves interviewed who the childhood is necessary to take care of it for being the most important moment of a person who in this can be left a imborrable mark or of happiness or sadness.
In order to close the saying yet, the family is made up of father, mother and son (s) what means that they do not work if they do not speak of which they feel of which it happens to them in the street of which they do, of which they like. Because that tends to avoid tragedies help you to know that you have in house and with who joins this person with which these are guache or violating as well as a kicker of children, then learns to recognize if something is not or and talk about and if cannot be solved tell someone but take care of your integrity and the one of that boy that accompanies to you because your you are the responsible person he is man or woman. And my message is a healthy family is a happy family does not matter that some members are not what was not solved before a boy (a) was born is not solved now so put the trousers to take a step to the final.

Elections in Colombia 2018

This year on Sunday, March 11 of the year 2018, were the elections for the senate, the House of Representatives and the presidential in the Country of Colombia, this elections are made every four years in every country in the world, many people were in disagree with some things that happend during the elections and many of them did not want to vote for any of the candidates.
There were many factor that people were in such scandal and disagree, it also during the elections it came a moment in wich there were only cards for one of the candidate and because of that many people almost every people were mad. I think there was a lot of disorganization on this years election organizers.
Some pros for this process that I could see is that people could notice and understand how some candidates could make things for their interest and to win the elections and they could see who were the correct person to vote for also there were big changes from the old governors, there were no violence, It served as a survey so that candidates can know what is the support they have in the country, also serve to predict what will be the result of the real presidential elections and also allow us to choose a candidate from the left and the right and make the elections shorter, leaving aside the other candidates who did not participate in any coalition.
Some cons that I could see in this process is how I tell before, the desorganization, the dishonest from the problem with the presidential consultation and the manipulation and corruption of votes with a member of the conservative part, another thing is that the ever-present polarization between the left and right in the country is enhanced, because each and every one of the candidates only talks about why their side is the right one in politics and they do not justify how to end the Polarization that is still latent in the country which leads me to think that everyone is taking advantage of this and also the elections brought a sharp division of the country to defend any of the candidates already chosen on each side affirming that it does not matter which one the country chooses, and all affirm that "the economy and the development are finished because that president is going to take us to the ruin".
I think that a conclusion for this could be that they have to be honest candidates in the elections, more organization for the next elections also people need to be more informed of the candidates and I wish that the next elections could be better than this, that the camdidates could be correct people and also the organizers of the event do not give advantage to other candidates like sometimes happend I expect a better election for the next four years that are coming and that each election could became better and better.